The Right of Aesthetic Realism to Be Known

Aesthetic Realism was founded by Eli Siegel in 1941

Art versus Weariness

Dear Unknown Friends:

“To What Is the Artist Responsible?” is an introduction Eli Siegel wrote in 1973 for a public seminar presented by Aesthetic Realism consultants. This introduction is both leisurely and definitive, kind and historic. As Mr. Siegel answers the question in the title, he explains something huge, which no other critic of art saw. We also publish “Woman: Energetic and Weary,” part of a paper by artist and consultant Marcia Rackow, from an Aesthetic Realism seminar that took place this July.

Aesthetic Realism shows that there are two big purposes fighting within every person, and one of them is the source of all art. The deepest purpose we have is to like the world honestly, to see meaning in it, structure in it. From this purpose have come all intelligence, kindness, courage, and every instance of art in any century and nation. But there is another purpose working in each of us: contempt, which Mr. Siegel defined as “the addition to self through the lessening of something else.” He showed—and there is no discovery more crucial or monumental—that all the injustice in history has come from this purpose; and that contempt is also the thing in every person which weakens our own minds and lives, even as we feel we are taking care of ourselves by having it.

The ordinary drive in people for contempt has many repercussions. It is what ruins love. It is also what makes us nervous and deeply unsure of ourselves. But one of the effects of our own contempt is the thing Ms. Rackow writes of here: weariness. I too will comment on weariness; because millions of people have a fatigue, lassitude, listlessness, a feeling that they are more tired than they ought to be, which troubles them keenly and which they don’t understand. Issue 168 of this journal is subtitled “Weariness”; and in it Mr. Siegel writes:

The relation of tiredness, fatigue, weariness, to contempt will be studied in coming years....One of the most important things to be seen in language is that when a person says: “I’m tired of all that,” he also means he is contemptuous of all that.

As Ms. Rackow describes—Mr. Siegel has explained that there is a desire in people, part of contempt, to be tired of the world. If the world, with all its objects and happenings and people and ideas and music and paintings and novels and possibilities, is something that burdens us, saps us, weighs us down—how superior to all that we are! A person, flinging himself onto a couch, and saying “I’ve had it! I’ve just got to rest!” can feel an unarticulated yet real triumph: he is going to a finer world, within himself. The more we can find the world of things and people a burden to us, the more something in us regally cavorts, feeling we have proven we were meant for better things, and the world within us, the “just me,” constitutes those better things.

Weariness and Economics

Weariness is a tremendous and intricate matter. There is certainly weariness that comes simply from working hard, or from the fact that we have been awake for perhaps 20 hours. All over America people have the fatigue of working too many hours, often at more than one job, in order to pay their bills and provide for their families. There has been a horrible fatigue forced on people for centuries, because the conditions of their work arose from the profit motive: from how they could be used to make profit for someone else.

So much of the energy of men, women, even children, that should have been used to find out about the world and care for it, has gone instead to supply others with money! We can see this, for instance, in Zola’s novel about French coal miners, Germinal. We can see it in Mrs. Browning’s furious and musical poem about children made to work in factories and mines, “The Cry of the Children.” There are these lines:

"For oh,” say the children, “we are weary, 


And we cannot run or leap; 


If we cared for any meadows, it were merely


To drop down in them and sleep."

And we see profit economics “wearing out...human creatures’ lives” in Thomas Hood’s “The Song of the Shirt.” We meet weariness in its very first line: “With fingers weary and worn.”

Despite current media lies about a “booming economy,” the energies of people are still being sapped, at too many hours for too little pay, by the profit system. And with that fact is another kind of tiredness, a true, beautiful tiredness: people are tired of being used unjustly on their jobs. They are tired of being seen and used with contempt. Mr. Siegel wrote in 1976: “Only contempt could permit a man to make money from the work of another—as man has done these hundreds of years” (TRO 166). There is now, in the feelings of Americans, a deep tiredness at the profit system. This tiredness is related to the tiredness about monarchy which Emerson described in his “Boston Hymn”: “God said, I am tired of kings, / I suffer them no more.”

The being worn out by work and the tiredness at being used for profit come from physiology and a sense of justice. I mention now some aspects of the other weariness: that coming from one’s own contempt.

The Other Weariness

Contempt can seem very languid: it can be that quiet inner sneer which people have about so much of life, “This doesn’t deserve my attention.” But contempt happens also to be an enormous user of energy. People have used themselves, their minds, the activity of their lives intensely—not trying to understand people, but trying to beat them out, be superior to them, fool them, have their way with them, impress them. Whatever the form, contempt is a wearying thing; because to use energy in a way that is against our life purpose, against what we are made for, is to weaken what we are—in the same way that wrongly using a machine wears it out and wrecks it.

And about that deepest purpose of ours, to be just to what is outside us: not using our energy for this true purpose is a wearying thing. It deadens us, in the same way that not using the muscles of our bodies makes for atrophy. So a businessman, spending his mental activity and the energy of his days on trying to make profit from people’s lives, on calculating how he can get as much out of them while giving as little as possible, may seem sometimes a dynamo; but he comes to feel an immense fatigue and a desire to just “get away from everything.” And he inevitably despises himself. Also, as people at social gatherings expend themselves insincerely, trying to impress and outdo each other and hide their true feelings and selves, they are preparing the deep fatigue they will feel later.

Aesthetic Realism is based on this great principle: “All beauty is a making one of opposites, and the making one of opposites is what we are going after in ourselves.” In all the arts, there is that which corresponds to energy and weariness: there are sounds, or shapes, which rise and sink; there is hubbub and stillness. But art is always respect for the world. Aesthetic Realism shows it is urgent that our lives become more and more like art. Through Aesthetic Realism they can, because Eli Siegel used the energy of his life in the most beautiful and courageous way: to be just to the things, people, terrific comprehensiveness of the world itself.

Ellen Reiss, Aesthetic Realism Chairman of Education


To What Is the Artist Responsible?

By Eli Siegel

The history of art shows that the artist is responsible certainly to himself, to the people of his time, to the people whom he knows best; but he is likewise responsible to the people of all time, and the people who represent reality itself—indeed, to reality itself. 

Raphael didn’t know that he was painting for someone who would be in some gallery in France or Italy, and for someone who would see a painting of his in the magnificent surroundings a noted art dealer could furnish. 

All artists feel responsible to everything that is and to every person. The responsibility takes two forms: deeply, every artist wants to encourage people to like the world; and also, every artist wants the world to be seen so that it can be liked more. Responsibility, then, can be put in two great divisions: 1) to people who may like the world; and 2) to the world, which can or may be liked. Whatever the painting—whether it’s abstract; or, as in the instance of Raphael, painting that shows the world as cause and effect at one with the world that is imagined and seen religiously (as in The Transfiguration); or whether the painting is an arrangement of certain lines, planes, and colors, as in Mondrian; or whether it is a deeply thought out change of the ordinary world, as with Picasso; or whether it is a seeing of all kinds of adventures in an old face, as with Rembrandt—the purpose is to make the world have more meaning. And when the world has more meaning, it is liked.

So the artist is also responsible to a possibility. All art says the world can be presented better, and can be seen better.

This possibility that the world be presented and seen better is the responsibility that Aesthetic Realism consultants have. Consultants are proud to have the same purpose that Raphael had, and the person who earlier presented Justinian and Theodora in mosaics; the responsibility that Praxiteles had, and the responsibility also that the sometimes tormented Renoir had.

Artists have a responsibility to the world, which they show through a painting. Aesthetic Realism consultants go a little further: they make grammar, words, and, it is hoped, verbal charm and power of this responsibility. The purpose is the same. A grammatical sentence can make ourselves have more meaning, and so can a painting known and unknown of what we, perhaps rightly, call the Renaissance.


Woman: Energetic and Weary

By Marcia Rackow

Women are energetic, and then don’t understand, as I once didn’t, why we get so weary, and just want to shut down. The agonizing fight between energy and weariness can end at last because Aesthetic Realism shows there is an honest solution. The answer is in aesthetics.

These opposites are beautifully together in the structure of reality. Our heart beats and rests for the same purpose—to pump blood. And the sunset, as Mr. Siegel described, 

is beautiful because it is one of the greatest examples of the co-presence of weariness and energy. There is that great sun deciding to get tired, and in the tiredness, being more of color than it ever was. [TRO 1078]

This is what we want to feel: that our energy and repose work for the same purpose. And the purpose that brings them together is to like the world. In his lecture Aesthetic Realism Looks at Things: Weariness and Energy, Mr. Siegel describes the purpose that weighs us down: “Every person is looking for a chance to be tired of life—because to be able to scorn life is a triumph for the non-related ego, or contempt” (TRO 1075). 

Energy, Weariness, and Me

I  was in a steep fight between being very active and feeling fatigued. Years ago, a coworker drew on a napkin a picture which he said represented me: of fireworks going up in the air, then fizzling out. I would give attention to something or someone—then lose interest. I would promise people I'd do something for them—then it would slip my mind. I was ashamed of being so changeable, but didn’t know how to be different. 

I was constantly on the move, and for ten years after college I traveled around Europe, then moved to San Francisco for a year, then back to New York, and to Italy again. Returning to New York once more, I plunged into great activity. Besides my regular job, I worked at home, staying up late designing and making felt banners and mobiles for children, and my apartment looked like one big playroom, with colored mouse-mobiles, cow-mobiles, etc. I was also going to exercise classes before work and ice-skating after work. And I was always making lists of things to do, which were more than twice what I could accomplish. My planning would sometimes keep me up so late that the next day I felt exhausted and could hardly do anything.

There was a kind of desperation in me to be in motion, as I see it now, to counter a terrific desire to give up and feel nothing was worth doing at all. For example, I would often get sick—nothing serious, just a cold, but I would welcome being in bed and out of circulation. I would ensconce myself in pillows and blankets, throw myself energetically into being supine, and say bye-bye to the world. 

I Learned about the Cause

Then in 1971 I met Aesthetic Realism, and began to learn about the fight in me between respect and contempt. In the first class taught by him that I attended, Mr. Siegel asked, “As artist, do you think every time you are working at something your purpose is to make the world look better?” “Yes,” I said. And he then asked, “Did you ever feel the whole world just became a blank?” I had; and to make what I was doing clear to me, Mr. Siegel suggested I close my eyes. He asked, “It’s the first time you did it publicly, isn’t it?” 

"It is!” I said. “Did you do it as a child?” he asked. “Yes, I certainly did,” I answered. And he continued, “Is it a desire to nullify reality, and show some opposition to it?” Yes! 

I am grateful to Aesthetic Realism that my respect for the world is so very much larger, and therefore I now have an energy—also an ease—I respect myself for. And that is so in my marriage to Ken Kimmelman, a filmmaker and Aesthetic Realism consultant: I want to know and strengthen Ken, and to learn from him.  

In a sentence, Eli Siegel describes the energy that makes for art: “The energy that insists on a thing’s having more meaning is deeply the true kind.” That is the energy people everywhere will be able to have, as they meet the magnificent education of Aesthetic Realism!